Welcome to the Diet Doctor podcast
with Dr. Bret Scher.
Today is my pleasure to be joined
by Dr. John Lemanski, bio hacker, M.D.
John story is a story
that’s not that uncommon.
He was very healthy and active
and competed in triathlons
or at least he thought he was healthy.
And then he found out maybe not so,
that he was actually pre-diabetic
and this was in his 20
so pretty young for that to happen
and that set him on this course
of becoming a bio hacker
which he’ll define for us
because that has a lot of different terms.
But basically he learned how to use
nutrition to heal himself
and then tried to use that as a doctor
to heal others
and that’s a fascinating journey
that he’s had.
So I hope you appreciate his story
and along the way we’ll pick up some tips
about how we can incorporate his lessons
into our lives to make things easier
and what it means to be a bio hacker,
what that means for nutrition
and for sun exposure
and when that can go a little too far.
So I think that’s really important
to keep in reference
that a lot of the things we see
in terms of bio hacking
are expensive and of questionable utility
so John is going to help us
figure some of that out
and figure out how to evaluate that.
So it’s a great discussion.
We also talk about families and kids
which is near and dear to my heart
so I hope you enjoy this discussion
with Dr. John Lemanski.
Dr. John Lemanski welcome
to the DietDoctor podcast.
Thanks so much for joining me today.
Thank you for having me.
It’s my pleasure to have you here.
So your story is unfortunately a story
that’s not that uncommon nowadays.
Someone who prioritizes their health,
is busy in their life.
is taking care of themselves
and a triathlete
and yet finds out despite being
in med school, competing in triathlons
that you’re not that healthy.
Tell me a little bit about that discovery
and what that meant for you.
Well, like you said
it wasn’t a weight issue with me.
It was a question of I’m following
what the guidelines are in terms of dietary,
I’m exercising probably
more than I should be
and I am relatively thin
and yet the question is I check my lab work
and lab work was HbA1c, fasting insulin,
and obviously just your basic chemistry
found that my insulin level was very high,
my HbA1c was relatively normal,
but still I was showing signs
of insulin resistance
just based on my fasting insulin score.
And so the question to me was as a medical
students I think I know everything, you know,
I am young, I am healthy, I’m doing
all the right things that I’ve been told
and yet these labs are not showing
or not reflecting that.
And that was pretty scary,
was pretty eye-opening to me at the time.
So I wanted to see why is this…
is it genetic, is it dietary,
am I exercising too much?
Which could be a possibility
and really got led down the path
of no, it’s actually what I’m eating.
most of these lab abnormalities.
And it was beyond
just the lab abnormalities,
it was also how I felt.
And so I’m sure you can remember
back when you’re a medical student,
but you’re always tired and you think,
“It’s because I’m studying all the time.”
But then I never got better
and it was a question
of how can I be so exhausted all-time
and yet, you know, I’m young,
healthy and fit
and it must be an answer
to that question.
So what were you eating at that time?
Was it the standard American diet,
was it processed foods and chips and sodas
or was it healthy whole grains and fruits…
like what was the mix?
No, it was mostly healthy whole grains.
Right… a lot of quinoa, pasta, bread,
a lot of fruits, a lot of vegetables,
really no fast food, so it wasn’t fast food,
it wasn’t processed food.
Maybe, you know,
maybe healthy processed food.
So whole foods, processed food,
that you think it’s healthy, but it’s not.
Because it still if you look at the container
and you look at ingredients,
most of the ingredients are going to be
some form of sugar initially.
But, you know, very little protein
so I was more kind of a pescatarian,
not too much protein
and essentially no fat.
If I was eating fat it was from olive oil,
olives and things like that,
but otherwise I was pretty much
And this was in your 20s,
basically in medical school.
So that’s I think so interesting for you,
it seems like it’s much earlier
than the average person
we’ve heard of this happening.
So maybe there is a genetic component to it
to suggest when it’s going affect us
and for you it was earlier,
but that kind of diet certainly can affect
anybody in anytime.
And I think also you have to take into account
some of the other factors at the time.
So obviously studying, being up all night,
so stress response to be in medical school,
being up, the stress of that,
also was probably playing a role
now that I look back.
But I still think genetically and dietary
was the main cause of that.
And this was like 15 years ago.
And so from there
was your first intervention,
a ketogenic diet to help reverse that
or did you have steps along the way?
So there wasn’t much information
about keto at that time.
I mean it was quite a long time ago.
Atkins was kind of
in the rebirth phase at the time.
I started reading about Atkins,
I’ve known a few people who had tried it
and had had great weight loss success.
I was a biochemistry major in college
and so going back to the biochemistry
and understanding how we are actually
processing the macronutrients,
what’s the process
that’s actually happening,
Atkins seemed to be a little bit more in the
line of I think this is going to be healthier,
which is based on simple biochemistry.
I didn’t like so much the amount of protein
that I was consuming based on that.
If you remember I went from pescatarian,
really like 30 g of protein maybe a day,
so pretty low on the protein,
pretty high on the exercise,
so that probably was not
a good combination.
But going to much higher levels of protein
I didn’t feel as good.
And then just kind of researching,
going to pub med,
going to library at the time,
you know, Google wasn’t
a big search engine like it is now
and looking at the research studies
that were out there at the time about keto
it just made more sense
from a physiological level.
So I started kind of transitioning into more
of a ketogenic, low-carb I would say initially
because I still do like vegetables.
And then as time has progressed
and now we have ways of really measuring
blood ketones, breath ketones,
glucose much easier,
I’ve got kind of transitioned into going
into ketosis quite exclusively
and then maybe coming out
once in a while,
but doing more of a low-carb.
So it’s a process I think
like most people experienced,
it’s not get it right the first time.
Well, what’s so interesting is you’re like
the perfect person for that to happen to,
because you’re in medical school,
because you had some knowledge
and you are the type of person
who wants to dig into things deeper
and you’re the self-experimenter.
So that’s sort of like sort of kicked off…
it sounds like that kicked off
your N of 1 experimentation
that you continue to keep up with.
I’m always interested in pushing the limit
of our understanding of things
regardless if it’s sports or health.
Yeah, I agree it’s probably a perfect match
in that sense.
And then to talk
about your medical career.
So from there you went to be
a hospitalist in Mississippi,
the heart of the obesity
and diabetes epidemic
and I’m sure you just saw
some horrendous things in the hospital
that could’ve been prevented
So I did internal medicine and my goal…
I was young, idealistic, I thought
I would change the world in terms of health.
I had this understanding of what it could do
for me just on the physiological level
and I had this understanding of what other
people who are using it were experiencing
in terms of getting off diabetic medications,
blood pressure medications.
So I figured, go to the worst state
in the country
where it’s a problem that is I think worse
than just the statistics would show.
And it is devastating in the south
and now really in the rest of the country,
but one of the main factors in terms
of risk factors for most things is age.
So if a 20-year-old comes in
complaining of chest pain,
you’re not going to run to the cath lab
with that patient.
Now for a 50-year-old you might think
a little bit more in terms of doing that.
In the south we would see MIs
in people in their 20s and 30s,
people on dialysis, people who would have
cardiomyopathy with EF of 10%.
Maybe obviously genetics is an issue,
but really no other factor that we can look
at and say, “This is what’s driving this.”
So that experience was eye-opening
in the sense that I saw
the worst possible outcome of everything
that you and I are discussing
at a very young age.
And so we’re in a situation there where
we talk about healthcare for everybody,
should we not have Obama care,
should we have some new form of healthcare,
but the question that I think
is never raised
is how we’re going
to manage chronic medical diseases,
which are starting at such a young age
and trying to maintain health
and happiness for those people.
So that experience I think
was eye-opening in many ways.
Yeah, for some people I think
it could be incredibly depressing
and make you sort of want to give up
and for other people would be empowering
to say, “How can I fix this?”
And so luckily for you
it seems like it was the latter.
Well, I think you get frustrated
especially if you have patients that you see
over and over and over
obviously in a hospital setting.
We don’t have follow-up,
we don’t see patients in the clinic,
but I would see you know patients
within a few days of being discharged
with really no change
in their underlying condition.
We just happened to tune
them up perfectly
with the right combination of medications
and then four days later they’re right back.
So you get into this question
of is that a futility of care?
Is there a better option?
Is there a way to maybe prevent
these things from happening?
And should the focus be on that?
And for me it was kind of a no-brainer
at that point.
I felt like I could make more of a difference
by preventing what I was seeing
in the hospital
than necessarily just treating it
after the fact.
It’s interesting that we use
the word “tune-up” a lot,
sort of like we are car mechanics,
just tuning things up.
Not fixing a problem,
not reversing the problem, just tuning it up
and the words we use matter
and reflects our philosophy
and for a lot of doctors
that’s the philosophy.
Well, it’s frustrating I think,
it’s extremely frustrating,
because how good of medical care is that
where you are just tuning people up?
Versus actually really getting down
to the root cause and addressing that
and then watching those symptoms
that are presenting, kind of disappear.
So then you have this dramatic
transformation from a hospitalist,
seeing these types of patients
to having more of a one-on-one,
I guess you could call it concierge,
but that comes in connotations,
but an one-on-one personalized approach
and frequently using a ketogenic diet
in those patients.
Now do you use a ketogenic diet
in pretty much everybody
or how do you approach that
and how do you evaluate them
to see what diet is that’s best for them,
for their situation?
Yeah, great question.
I think you see in the conferences this push
So everybody is different
based on the genetic factors,
based on their lab markers,
kind of what their goals are.
I think nutrition is essential
to everybody changing,
whether it’s going from a process
to fast food diet to just eating real food,
I think people will have tremendous success
in reversing a lot of their markers.
For me it’s a question
of what is the goal of the person.
So keto or low-carb
I’d say is ubiquitous
for the patient population
that I take care of initially.
And to stress by… based on how
metabolically sick they are.
And so I think Gary Taubes put the slide up
yesterday about this sensitivity to insulin,
everybody has a threshold in terms
of how many carbs they can consume
before they really kind of push
the insulin level back up.
Same thing happens with the patients
that I take care of,
it’s really figuring out first
what is their threshold.
So are they metabolically sick?
Do they have diabetes? Which a lot do.
Do they have insulin resistance?
A lot do.
Do they have high blood pressure?
So do they have risk factors that need to be
addressed more aggressively initially,
then they’ll be ketogenic to begin with.
And then eventually it’s a question of can
you transition back into more of a low-carb?
Because I don’t think everybody needs
to be in strict ketosis all the time.
But I think it’s an extremely powerful tool
to be used for specific situations.
And that makes a lot of sense
If you’re treating diabetes,
if you’re treating insulin resistance.
The further you can go on the spectrum
the better you’re going to treat it.
But at some point
people want to change sometimes.
Some people love being in ketosis,
they feel better, they think better
and they never want
to do anything differently.
Some people sort of miss
some of the lifestyle they had before
and want to find a happy medium.
So what do you use in your practice
to decide is somebody “ready” for that
and how do you follow them?
Do you do oral glucose tolerance tests?
Is it based on their insulin levels A1c?
What kind of tools do you use?
So the first thing before we even talk
about how to transition
I would say a good way
to kind of keep people in this situation
where they want to stay in ketosis
or they want to be restrictive
is making it applicable
to their cultural situation.
So for instance in the south, you know,
barbecue, drinking will be a big kind
of social gathering factor,
so trying to figure out how do you actually
make low-carb keto accessible
to people who want to stay
in those situations?
And there’s tricks you can use.
But let’s say
just from a clinical perspective
if somebody wants to transition from keto
to low-carb, a couple of things I’ll look at.
So I don’t really like
the oral glucose tolerance test.
I do like it in combination
with the insulin test.
So I think that gives you
a lot more information.
So doing a fasting insulin,
doing the glucose tolerance test,
doing the insulin test to see… number one
is fasting insulin suppressed in general.
But number two, what is the response?
So if they’re still having
an exaggerated response
then their threshold of carbohydrate intake
will probably be much lower
than somebody who has
a normal physiological response.
So obviously using metrics like HbA1c
blood pressure measurements,
high-sensitivity CRP, things like that,
but the main ones I would say are
have they reached their goal in terms
of what they’re trying to accomplish?
Do they have an abnormal response
to that test?
What is their fasting insulin?
And so a lot of people will say,
I want to be ketogenic to lose weight.
And once I hit my weight goal,
okay I’m all right, I’ll back off a little bit.
So what are your thoughts on weight
as a metric versus some of these other
metrics you mentioned?
Yeah, I hate weight as a metric.
It’s probably one
of my biggest pet peeves.
I tell people weigh themselves
one time initially
and I prefer things like Dexa scan
or Body Pod
to get an actual lean body mass perspective,
what’s the visceral fat,
because it is much more important,
we’re looking at getting rid of visceral fat,
obviously some subcutaneous fat,
fatty liver disease,
we are looking at trying to reverse
So I tell people, “Weigh yourself initially
and then don’t weigh yourself for a month.”
Inevitably I find that most people come
to keto because they want to lose weight,
that’s the number one driving factor
and it makes sense.
But most people as they transition and they
start noticing things are getting better,
so their joints don’t heard,
they don’t have headaches,
they are not frequently hungry,
they are sharper, more cognitively sharp,
inevitably that becomes really
the driving factor I think for most people
to want to stay or at least
kind of transition in and out.
But in terms of answering a question,
you know, everybody has a weight goal
that they want to get to.
I use body fat percentage
as a better metric
and I try to encourage the people
I take care of to use that as their metric.
You know, how is your visceral fat
responding to what we’re doing,
how is the body fat
And so if we get down to the goal
body fat percentage,
visceral fat is gone,
lab markers are back to normal,
then yeah, I think
it’s a very reasonable question
to say, let’s try some different things,
let’s expand your carbohydrate.
I think Andreas showed very nicely
that in a ketogenic community
we also have given carbohydrates
a bad name
and they’re not necessarily bad.
Obviously highly processed ones
are going to be detrimental to our health,
but incorporating healthy vegetables
I think is a perfect way to transition.
Diet is a tool and you have to use
the right diet for the right job basically.
And then of course when we talk
about the food we eat
we also have to talk about the timing,
when we eat and when we don’t eat.
So time restricted eating, intermittent
fasting gained a lot of popularity,
that’s been around for ever basically.
So what are your stages of helping people
using that to benefit their health?
We like to make the old new again
and we take concepts that I think
have been used for generations
and then bring them back and say,
look I have this new thing.
But ancestrally I mean
it’s how we essentially lived.
Taking somebody who’s on a western diet
and saying, “We will get you into ketosis,
we’re going to fast for five days”,
you’ll probably lose that person for the rest
of their life and never going to do that again.
So initially I think my approach
is change your diet,
so change it from what you’re eating
to low-carb, to keto,
get adapted, get fat adapted,
actually make the enzymes that you need
and then start incorporating
some other factors,
like time restricted feeding,
intermittent fasting, longer-term fast,
because I think that’s an extremely
powerful way of suppressing insulin.
Plus I think there’s a lot of people
who will reach a threshold
where they just cannot break through
that kind of plateau.
And incorporating something
like the intermittent fasting
tends to help tremendously.
You know what’s interesting is people
talk about their stalls and their plateaus
usually again with weight.
But we can see the same things
whether it’s HbA1c or glucose tolerance
and fasting seems to work for that as well.
Correct, and that makes sense
because you’re really again going
to the root cause,
which is insulin being elevated to trying
to suppress those as much as as possible.
Plus what I find interesting at this time
is that the research that’s going on
to support these claims
is also extremely powerful.
So looking at studies that show
that you actually need to have periods
of time where you’re not eating
to activate enzymes needed
to do beta-oxidation.
That makes sense that you’ll be able to deplete
your glycogen storage to some degree,
So people use weight as metric
but that’s the reason,
is you are actually going
to the underlying cause and addressing it.
And for most people I think it’s pretty
simple to do an intermittent fast,
especially if you do it, you know,
early dinner, late breakfast…
It makes perfect sense for most people
to be able to do that.
One of the interesting concepts
about intermittent fasting
or time restricted eating
and the body’s natural circadian rhythm
is to try and do them in tune,
but what I find is that goes
against sort of our social constructs.
The traditional intermittent fast
is to skip breakfast
or have a late breakfast
and then have dinner
because that’s what fits more
with our society.
I want to have dinner with the kids
and the family, dinner is a social outing,
but it seems like our circadian rhythm
would say the other way.
We should have the breakfast
and skip the dinner.
So how do you balance that
with your patients?
Yeah, that’s a great question.
I think Marty Kendall down in Australia
is doing a lot of independent research
about the timing of food
and his argument would be
that from a physiological perspective
you should be eating breakfast
as your main meal.
The way that I kind of make the argument
is you’re giving yourself a period of time
where you’re not consuming calories.
For me I do it this way where I eat dinner
and then during the day I don’t eat much.
And I do it because I want to have dinner
with the children.
So I think in the big scheme in terms of all
the different things that you will do
to improve your health,
if the timing of your main meal
is really the deciding factor,
then I think we’ve probably gone
So I would say, and I know
I’m kind of hedging on this question,
but I would say if it’s going
to allow you to do it
and dinner is the best way because you
want to have family interaction,
then I would do it that way.
If you don’t have a– let’s say you’re single
or you have a girlfriend
or you don’t have this kind of idea
that you have to eat dinner as a family,
then yeah, I think eating in the morning
is perfectly fine.
And I don’t think it’s a hedgy answer,
I think it’s a great answer.
You don’t want perfect
to be the enemy of good basically.
And even if our insulin sensitivity is worse
in the evening because of the circadian rhythm,
the main goal is having a space
between your meals
and whatever it needs to accomplish that
is the good.
And then if you can do perfect, great,
if not, it may affect your life.
And interestingly enough I think
for people who are kind of type A
and have to do a lot of work
during the day
I find myself personally that if I eat
a very heavy meal for breakfast
and make that the main meal,
I am actually quite lethargic
for a good portion of the morning
which is when I do most of my work.
So I find it for me because I’m fasting
most of the night,
you know, I have high ketone levels,
I feel very, very sharp when I wake up.
I know it sounds monotone
but this is me being sharp.
But this is me awaken,
so for me it works well in that sense
and a lot of people that I work with
they are also pretty active in the morning
and so it works well for them too.
Yeah, it makes a lot of sense.
So you’ve been known
as a keto hacker and a bio hacker.
And bio hacking is a term
that gets used quite a lot lately
and it has different connotations
for different people
and it can mean
a lot of different things.
Some not so pleasant to be honest
and some pretty basic.
And a lot of the bio hacking I hear you
talk about seems rather simplistic,
but I want to hear you kind of define
how you see the term bio hacking
and how you use it to help yourself
and your patients.
Yeah great question.
So I define bio hacking
as making the environment work for you
instead of against you
which is a pretty simple concept.
I think on one extreme you have bio hacking
which does have a bad connotation in a way
because some people are maybe pushing it
a little bit too far
injecting themselves with iso-tracers
or doing stem cell injections
which maybe don’t have
the scientific backing yet,
but on the other hand there are simple
that are still I think
to be considered bio hacking.
And those are the ones that I focus on.
You and I as clinicians will talk to our
patients about diet and exercise,
but I don’t think we necessarily–
and I don’t speak for you,
but we don’t necessarily go into depth
in terms of what that means.
So we’ll just say, kind of blanket statement,
okay make sure you do that and exercise,
but what does that actually mean?
What are some of the simple cost-effective
really lifestyle modifications that you can do
which actually from a bio hacking
standpoint impact your health tremendously,
probably even more so
than maybe some of the more extreme
forms of bio hacking.
And I don’t have anything
against certain techniques
like hyperbaric oxygen chambers
and sort of other kind of more advanced
bio hacking techniques that are being used
but the question really becomes, how can
you apply those to the majority of people?
Can you spend $40 a session
in a cryo-chamber?
Well, most people will say, “I can do it once,
but I can’t do that on a regular basis.”
So then what’s the benefit
of having that?
And so I really define bio hacking
as what are the things that you can do
to improve your health, affect yourself
from a metabolic standpoint positively
and do it cost-effectively?
Like getting out in the sun
and getting more sunshine.
I mean in some circles
that’s considered bio hacking,
in some circles
is considered common sense.
Yeah, but then you look–
You know, EPA came out with a statistic
that said 90% of our life is spent indoors.
So yes it sounds simplistic,
it sounds like common sense
and yet we’re not doing it.
So the question becomes
how do you do it effectively
from a time management perspective…?
Because we’ll strapped for time.
…And then do it without having to spend
thousands of dollars on some gizmo?
And so simple things
like going outside in the morning
and getting sun exposure, getting actually
the activation of your SCN,
getting your circadian rhythm back in order
I think is extremely important,
focusing on sleep is extremely important.
I just did an experiment where I worked
five nights as a hospitalist.
I haven’t worked nights in–
I don’t remember when,
I don’t want to remember when,
to see what’s going be the metabolic impact.
And so in five days I gained 7 pounds,
not changing anything dietary,
so maintained my normal fasting routine,
just changed the timing,
so there is an impact,
so I was eating at night.
Fasting glucose was 15 points higher.
So a part of that is probably
because of the time of the eating
and the sleep pattern was horrible.
So sleep has a huge effect on our ability
to be metabolically healthy.
So simple things like that I think
are extremely effective.
Yeah, I mean shift workers
are a huge problem in this country
and a lot of times
they don’t have an option,
is their life, it’s their job,
they can’t change that.
So what would you recommend
a shift worker do
to try and mitigate the negative impact
of that type of lifestyle?
That was part of the reason for doing it,
is to see,
because I get a lot of questions,
“I am a shift worker, I work late nights
and no matter what I do
I cannot lose weight. Why?”
I think very similar to the people
who were metabolically sick,
if you’re in a situation
where you’re not a shift worker,
you probably have to be a little bit more
strict in terms of being in ketosis.
At that point I think getting your circadian
rhythm as best as you can
is extremely important.
So getting sun exposure during the day,
making sure that when you’re sleeping
it’s quality sleep that’s being tracked,
focusing on some of the other biohacks
to really kind of help
in terms of pushing the envelope
in your favor,
because you have this major kind
of obstacle which is sleep,
which is affecting your cortisol,
which is affecting your hunger levels,
which is also affecting your desire
for craving carbohydrates.
So it’s extremely difficult I think
for night shifters.
So we’ve talked about sun exposure
a couple of times
and one of the things I think is interesting
is looking at the data for sun exposure.
It is hard to come up
with the perfect level.
Like ideally we would just be outside
and play and have fun
and get good sun exposure
but like you said is not happening.
So what I have read it seems
like 20 minutes of whole body exposure,
not just like face, head, hands,
but 20 minutes of whole body exposure
seems to be like the minimum threshold
that people should be shooting for,
people like maximum benefit
for minimal effort.
So is that what you recommend too
or you have a number in mind that you use?
Yeah, I agree with you and I think
the data is not that strong either way.
But I would say 20 minutes…
hopefully people after this are not going
on their front yard,
you know, fully naked,
getting sun exposure,
but I think 20 minutes and also
the timing of the day is important,
so ideally noontime would be the best
getting maximum exposure,
but not getting too much,
then you are at high risk of skin cancer.
Right, that’s the balance.
And that’s why for people like us who were
outside a lot with our athletics,
but yet for me at least it doesn’t count
for sun exposure,
because I had a hat or helmet,
I’ve got long sleeves, long pants
and I am not getting my sun exposure
despite being outside
and that’s an important concept
Like I’m outside plenty,
I don’t need to worry about that.
Well, a lot of times you still do,
but there is that balance.
Right, and I think doing it in a way
where it’s part of your routine,
so I think even if you work let’s say, going
outside for lunch, getting some exposure,
rolling up your sleeves would be a good way
to at least get some sun exposure,
at least get some vitamin D production,
but otherwise I think 20 minutes
is probably ideal.
And what I love about that is it’s free,
no gadgets, you don’t need anything,
just walk outside.
Now I see you have two rings on.
Yes, married only once.
Yes and then the other I assume
is an Oura ring.
So now we get into gadgets.
A bit more expensive and technology.
Some people love it, they get into
the technology and want more and more
and some people are hesitant
and afraid of the technology.
So is Oura ring sort of one of your basic
go-to technologies that you recommend?
Yeah and I don’t have
any affiliation with Oura ring,
but I think for me,
I am more of a data person,
I probably should’ve been an engineer
like most of the other speakers,
but I think data for me helps drive changes
in our behavior.
So for instance I know
I get instant feedback from…
let’s say I eat later at night which for me
I noticed would cause certain things.
So I wouldn’t have the deep, the REM sleep
at levels that I would want
to get the restorative sleep.
I would notice that my resting heart rate
would take a lot longer to come down
which makes sense.
I would notice that the quality of sleep
was not good.
So changing timing of diet for me
was based on sleep patterns
and fasting glucose,
but mostly sleep patterns.
So I do think there is a balance
because there is so much technology.
Which ones are going to be
the most effective?
In my opinion after nutrition
I would say sleep is the second
most important factor in people,
whether or not that’s science base or not,
just my clinical experience,
that’s what I’ve noticed.
So I think yes there is
a cost associated with it,
but the amount of feedback that you get
to me is tremendous.
Now there’s a lot of other gadgets out there
I wouldn’t spend a dime on.
And so there is this balance
of trying to figure out
which ones are going to be useful
versus which one are just going to be
for fun to show you have a new gadget.
And can we do it another way?
As if you drink too much alcohol one night
or eat too late, it will affect your sleep.
You know that,
you don’t need a gadget to know that.
But if you want to fine-tune it
to more detailed or less obvious causes,
then maybe the gadget comes into play.
So for most people that I work with
they are really looking forward
that extra edge I guess
in terms of whether or not
to improve cognition
so that they are more successful
For them those little changes
do make a difference.
But at the same time it’s not a question
of just using the data
and focusing solely on the data
and making changes to improve the data.
It’s using as a tool.
Kind of like you would use lab markers
as a tool.
You could run a plethora of labs
that might impress people,
but are you going to use those
or are they going to be useful for you
or is it just going to be an added cost?
And so I think it’s really weighing that
balance based on your clinical experience
what’s going to benefit you.
Yeah, that’s a great point that you bring
about the labs,
because I think it’s pretty clear
in contemporary medical practice,
they are just scratching the surface
of what is available on labs,
and no one is checking fasting insulin hardly,
advanced lipid testing,
but yet on the other side you have
some doctors and practitioners
who just check thousands
of dollars of labs,
most of which is not going to have
much of an impact.
So you’ve got to find
that middle ground as well
and the same for technological information
with bio hacking our lifestyle.
When I started I was that doctor
who would check a plethora of labs.
I don’t even know what half of the labs
were in terms of interpreting,
but I think it also as you gain experience
you realize you need less tests,
but you need them to be very specific
to what you’re looking for.
And so same thing I think
applies with the technology.
I would rather spend money on something
that I think is going
to beneficially impact my health
and it’s going give me data to do that,
but I wouldn’t spend money on something
that I think is just another gadget.
Like simple sleep hacks
could be just an eye mask
and, you know, 10 bucks
for an eye mask or less
and you need that multiple hundred dollar
Tom Brady smart pajamas for your sleep hacking.
I’ll take one, but no.
Is he selling those?
Yeah, I think it was last year,
I don’t know if they survived or not,
but there were these smart pajamas
that’s supposed to you tell you
how much you’re moving
and your respirations and so forth.
I mean, you can get
on the extreme words,
a lot of kind of fad tools
that are not useful.
So one fad tool, or one tool that seems
like it could be fad and others swear by it
And when people think of a sauna,
they probably think of you go to the gym,
then you go to the sauna,
and do sweat it out a little bit
and release the toxins as some people say,
sweat out the toxins,
but now it’s taken on
a whole new meaning…
infrared saunas, regular saunas,
people are buying saunas for their houses.
So again it gets into that next level
of this isn’t necessary for everybody,
but does the science
back up the investment?
And some people could say yes,
I am curious to get your opinion on that.
So depends on what your goals are.
So in terms of most of the science
that’s come out on sauna,
mostly from Finnish countries,
but that data is really looking
at cardiovascular health for the most part
and there are some other studies
that look at the impact on cortisol levels,
on fasting insulin, on heat shock proteins,
so there is data that is coming out
and I think one of the exciting things
about the bio hacking kind of world now
is that a lot of research is being done
to find out is there actually basis to this?
And the studies that look at cardiovascular
health are in my opinion pretty impressive.
Does that merit
a $4000 or $5000 investment?
Probably not for most people.
Again going back to cost
and cost being cost-effective,
most people have a gym membership;
whether they use it or not is a different story,
but most gyms are going to have a sauna.
And you had asked me a question before
we got online as far as biohacks
and the way I look at it is number one,
is it going to be effective?
Number two, is it going to be safe?
Are there going to be downsides
as far as doing it?
And then is it going to be applicable
I think when you look at sauna…
is it effective? I think it’s effective.
I think in terms of
a lot of people I work with
really focusing on getting their fasting
insulin as suppressed as possible.
Sauna helps with that.
So it increases a couple of things,
but increases insulin sensitivity
in skeletal muscles.
And so if you can actually impact insulin
and fasting glucose,
can you impact them metabolically?
And I would say that you can.
Is there a downside?
Is there a risk involved with it?
Sure for certain people, if you are elderly,
if maybe have some cardiac arrhythmia,
get dehydrated… sure, but in general
I would say it’s a safe modality
that has been used for centuries.
And then is it applicable?
I think for most people if they use
their gym membership,
they can go to their gym sauna they don’t
have to have a huge cost expenditure for that
and it helps to think
for a lot of people who use it.
Now I’d hate for someone to hear that
and say , “I don’t have to worry
about my nutrition.
I just have two go hit the sauna
and improve my insulin sensitivity.”
So I’d imagine the impact it has is a fraction
of what it would be for nutrition
or fasting or time restricted eating.
So would be again taking someone
at the good level
and trying to get them
to a little bit higher level perhaps.
Again in pretty much any talk that I give
I will say nutrition is–
I hate to use the image of a pyramid
just because it’s been butchered.
The food pyramid
has been butchered.
Yeah, but we’ll call it
the keto hacking pyramid,
but the base is going to be nutrition.
And obviously my experience low-carb keto
will be for the majority of people,
then it’s really getting to that next level
in terms of optimizing your health.
A lot of people I work with are interested
in living longer
but they also want to live longer
they don’t want to be dealing
with chronic diseases
and so for those people
implementing certain biohacks like that
can help take them to the optimization
of what they’re looking for.
And to get back to the sauna,
when you said that outcomes have been
for cardiovascular health,
is it mostly sort of endothelial health
and vasodilatation and–?
So most of the studies have looked
at those two specific things
and then mortality and morbidity
which I know you can play with statistics
but that’s really the focus
of most of the research.
Interesting, but I can’t imagine it shows
mortality difference for sauna use.
No, because it’s such a short study.
And so if you’ll recommend somebody to
use the sauna at the gym since it’s there,
five minutes, 10 minutes,
is there a threshold?
So 19 minutes is a threshold,
so 19 minutes four times a day is really
kind of the maximal benefit from that
versus the trade-off
of diminishing returns.
All right, interesting.
I mean when new technology
comes out like that,
I think it’s so interesting
how to interpret the science
and how to incorporate it
to see if it works for people
and I like your philosophy;
does it work and is it safe?
Is there downside?
That’s always a very important question.
And then is it accessible?
And infrared saunas,
I would not recommend people to get them.
No, not at all.
But something like–
You know, the question also is, do you get
more benefit from that infrared sauna
versus a dry or wet sauna?
I would say the heat is going to be
the most important thing
rising your core temperature.
There are some added benefits
but again is it worth
the $4000 investment?
I would say most people would say no.
But in bio hacking circles
that’s what a lot of people are promoting.
These amazing technologies
that are sort of out of reach for most people.
Sure, which doesn’t make sense.
We’ve touched on a lot of topics here
and I just want to touch one more thing
because you are a big family man
and I really appreciate that personally
and I’m sure a lot of our listeners
do as well,
but you are taking a little bit
on how you’re raising your family
and living your life.
You’re taking sort of a nomadic approach
Tell me briefly about that.
I have always been a big traveler and
I have traveled all over the world,
I was fortunate enough to be raised
by parents who loved to travel
and I want to have my children
have the same experience
I think in a time where especially
in the United States we are so polarized,
we see things extremely different.
I think you can learn a lot about our country
but also about people
by being with them
in different experiences,
by learning what’s driving their understanding
of politics or religion or health.
And showing how different parts
of the country
are going to experience
a low-carb or ketogenic diet differently,
based on resources,
based on socioeconomic status,
based on– culturally.
So obviously people in the South
will have different cultural norms
than people in the northeast
and yet we can all do some version
of low-carb or keto but a bit differently.
And I want to show how that’s possible and
maybe educate more people along the way.
So you are just starting your journey now.
Yeah, next month we’ll be going,
we are starting in Puerto Rico.
We had a really good expense there
and so we’re starting there
and we’re going to travel up East Coast over
and down the West Coast
and then in the middle of the country.
And then fingers crossed but maybe do that
in Europe afterwards.
Fantastic, I mean that’s such
an unique experience.
I mean it sounds good.
Call me in a month
and ask me how I am doing,
but yeah I think it’s very easy to get stuck
in kind of the daily routine
and I kind of talked about this,
but then the question really becomes
are we exposing our children
to different cultures,
to different experiences?
I think if we can do that
we will be better off as a nation,
we’ll understand each other better,
hopefully we’ll get away from kind
of the political swings that we’re seeing.
In transitions like that,
in travel like that,
can be tough on health
and nutritional routines
because we can talk about routines
in a negative side,
but we can also talk about routines
in a positive side
that you’re able
to take care of yourself better
with sleep habits
and nutritional habits.
So I am anxious to see how you come up
with more hacks for that.
Yeah, luckily I have been traveling
for quite some time
and so I’ve come up
with hacks for myself,
but it’s a different story when you have
three little children who are hungry
and they want something different
than boiled eggs and, you know, avocado.
So it’s definitely an experience
but it’s also a way to show other people
who are dealing with children
maybe how to actually transition them
over to more of a low-carb version.
I know that’s a big struggle
for many families,
is they are low-carb,
they’ve seen the benefits,
but they transition their children
and they don’t have to be ketogenic,
but maybe transition them over
from the junk processed food…
How do you do that?
How do you do that when you travel?
I think those are topics
that are always being brought up.
Right, and the age
of the kids matters too.
I imagine in the teenage years
it can get a little more challenging
as they need a sort of independence.
Yeah, we have to do it now
before they are taller than we are.
That’s the goal, because once they are
taller, you know, all bets are off.
Right, don’t make it a power struggle,
but make it a teaching.
Exactly, make it an adventure,
we label it as an adventure
and I think at this point
they see it that way.
And hopefully they will have
that will help them mature
as good human beings.
That’s what’s important.
Well, dr. John Lemanski
thanks so much for joining me.
Where can people learn more about you?
Biohackmd.com and in social media
biohackmd is most of it.
Great, thanks for joining me
on the Diet Doctor podcast.